Archives & Counterdata

Biased and unpresentative datasets are one of the consequences incurring when people from dominant groups create most of our data products. Another effect could also be missing datasets. By exploring, collecting, systematizing, and analyzing counterdata - missing datasets that are not being collected because of e.g. bias, lack of social and political will, or structural oppression, we can find cultural indications of what is considered as important and what is not. This will not only allow us to see who benefits from – but also how bias and oppression might be baked into data practices and data products. Thus, collecting countadata can act as a way to explore the asymmetry between who is collecting, storing, and analyzing data, and whose data are collected, stored, and analyzed.

Deconstructing Gender in Asylum Categories: An Archival Perspective on a Practice with Limited Access

Authors: Kristin Kaltenhäuser, Tijs Slaats, Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, and Naja Holten Møller

Link to article

Data as a Lens for Understanding what Constitutes

Credibility in Asylum Decision-making

Authors: Trine Rask Nielsen & Naja Holten Møller

Link to article

 

Confronting Asylum Decision-making through Prototyping Sensemaking of Data and Participation

Authors: Trine Rask Nielsen, Panagiota Katsikouli, Anna Højberg Høgenhaug, William Hamilton Byrne, Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, Tijs Slaats, Henrik Palmer Olsen, Thomas Troels Hildebrandt, and Naja Holten Møller

Link to article

Previous
Previous

Tech in the Trenches of Society

Next
Next

Privacy & Creepy Technologies